← Pooja Verma
BenchmarkedIssue · 29 Sep 2026
Event recap · about a 6-minute read

OpenAI DevDay 2026: three launches that matter, and a catch

Always-on agents, a cheap near-flagship model and an up-to-8× speed tier led more than 20 announcements. Independent tests call the model a value pick, not the smartest, and the $200 plan shrank.

Sam Altman on stage in front of a slide listing dots, GPT-6.1 Sol, Ultrafast, Pro 500 and other launches
The keynote's launch slide, photographed in the room at Fort Mason, San Francisco. Source: @thsottiaux.

The short version

  • Dots: always-on agents powered by GPT-6 Astra, each with its own cloud computer. Paid plans only, from Pro 100. vendor
  • GPT-6.1 Sol: $2 / $10 per million tokens, a fifth of Astra's price, launched a week after GPT-6 Sol. vendor
  • Value, not the top spot: Artificial Analysis scores Sol 52 at $0.72 per task; Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 56 at $7.60. independent
  • Ultrafast: up to 8× faster output in Codex, at 6× the API price, and only on the new $500 Pro plan in ChatGPT. vendor
  • The catch: new Pro 200 subscribers get a lower allowance, about half in API-dollar terms, per OpenAI's Codex lead. vendor

01What OpenAI announced

OpenAI called its 29 September event “our biggest yet, with more than 20 major announcements,” and said ChatGPT now has 1.2 billion weekly users. vendor It arrived after a difficult month: Anthropic's Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 had topped benchmarks, Meta's free Muse agent had launched on 8 September, and, according to the Wall Street Journal, OpenAI cancelled GPT-6.1 Astra after it regressed on deception and “scope authorization.” press

Beyond the three headline launches, the list included:

02Dots: agents that never sleep

OpenAI's dots page: they have their own cloud computer, learn from feedback over time, and can work towards your goals 24/7
OpenAI's description of dots, highlighted. Source: OpenAI, Introducing dots.

Each dot runs on GPT-6 Astra with its own cloud computer and browser, connects to 4,000+ apps through plugins, and learns from feedback. Users reach it in ChatGPT, Slack, Teams or by voice call; texting is “coming soon.” vendor

Watch the dots launch film on X.

03GPT-6.1 Sol: OpenAI's numbers

OpenAI's model cards: GPT-6 Astra $10 / $50, GPT-6.1 Sol $2 / $10, GPT-6 Luna $0.10 / $0.50
OpenAI's lineup with per-million-token prices; Sol is highlighted. Source: OpenAI.

OpenAI pitches Sol as nearly matching Astra on agentic coding, computer use and professional work at one-fifth of Astra's token prices: $2 input, $0.10 cached and $10 output per million tokens. It's in ChatGPT Work, Codex and the API, but “not yet available in Chat.” vendor

Terminal-Bench Science chart: GPT-6.1 Sol at $5.47 per task versus more than $23 for Astra and Opus 5.5
Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 at max effort: $5.47 per task for Sol vs $23.21 for Opus 5.5 and $23.80 for Astra. Source: OpenAI.

The same chart shows the limit: Astra still tops it at 68.1%. These are OpenAI's charts, and some Anthropic costs include fallbacks, so the comparisons aren't strictly like for like. vendor

04What independent testers found

Artificial Analysis chart of Intelligence Index versus cost per task, shared by Theo
Artificial Analysis's index vs cost per task, as shared by @theo. Data: Artificial Analysis.
TestResultKind
AA Intelligence Index, Sol max52, #10 of 221, $0.72/taskindependent
AA, Sol high / medium50 ($0.32) / 48 ($0.21)independent
AA, Claude Sonnet 5.5 max / high56 ($7.60) / 47 ($1.08)independent
AA, Opus 5.5 max / GPT-6 Astra58 / 53independent
AA speed and verbosity~67 tokens/s; 67M tokens vs 82M medianindependent
JetBrains, same Three.js prompt$0.553, 17 min (GPT-6 Sol $1.01, 22 min)community

The value case holds up. At medium effort, Sol (48, $0.21) edges Sonnet 5.5 at high (47, $1.08) for about a fifth of the cost. At max, it is 4 points behind Sonnet 5.5 at roughly a tenth of the cost per task. independent Theo reported that his own Terminal-Bench 4 run beat Opus 5.5 for about 1/30th of the price; that result is unverified. community

05Ultrafast: speed at 6× the price

Ultrafast generates up to 8× faster in Codex (300 tokens per second) and up to 6× faster in the API. Only Astra has it today; Sol Ultrafast is “coming soon.” In OpenAI's demo, the same build took 30.3 seconds on standard and 6.4 seconds on Ultrafast. vendor

OpenAI API pricing: gpt-6-astra Ultrafast at $60 input, $6 cached, $75 cache writes, $300 output
Astra Ultrafast API prices per million tokens, exactly 6× standard ($10 / $50). Source: OpenAI API pricing.

In ChatGPT, Ultrafast comes only with Pro 500. Sam Altman called it “so fast I do not ever want to go back.” vendor Watch the side-by-side demo on X.

06The Pro 200 cut and the $500 plan

Tibo's post: the new Pro $200 plan will net out at half the dollar in API spend
Posted the night before DevDay; 13.5M views and 6.8K replies at the time of capture. Source: @thsottiaux.

The night before the keynote, Codex lead Tibo said the reopened Pro $200 plan “will net out at half the dollar in API spend” compared with the old one, and that OpenAI won't bring back the five-hour limit. OpenAI's help center confirms new Pro 200 subscribers get a lower allowance; existing subscribers keep theirs through 29 October 2026, and the price stays $200. vendor

Press reports put specific numbers on it: Engadget says usage drops from 20× to 10× the Plus allowance, and The Next Web reports a one-time $2,500 usage credit. Neither figure appears on OpenAI's page. press

OpenAI help center table: Pro 100 $100, Pro 200 $200, Pro 500 $500, Ultrafast included only in Pro 500
The three Pro tiers; only Pro 500 includes Ultrafast. Source: OpenAI Help Center.

The new Pro 500 costs $500 a month for 25× the Plus allowance. vendor

07Decisions API: OpenAI's take on Jev

The Decisions API uses GPT-6 Luna to pick from answers a developer defines, using text or image context, to classify, route or choose an agent's next step. It's in limited preview, and pricing hasn't been announced. In OpenAI's demo of 10,000 routing requests, each took 150 ms versus 1.6 s. vendor Watch the demo on X.

Diogo Almeida's post: begun, the clone war has, with a Yoda meme
TypeSafe founder Diogo Almeida reacts to a product shaped like his company's Jev. Source: @CompleteSkeptic.

Builders quickly called it a “Jev killer” (@theo, @birdabo, @mreflow), after TypeSafe's tool launched 15 September. Its founder later posted that it “seems to be luna with constrained decoding.” community

08Where it falls short

09How it stacks up

OpenAI launchRivalHow they compare
DotsMeta Muse, xAI Grok BotSame always-on idea. Dots bring Astra, 4,000+ apps and Slack/Teams, but Muse is free.
GPT-6.1 SolClaude Sonnet 5.5Same $2 / $10 list price. Sol is cheaper per task; Sonnet scores higher at max (56 vs 52).
Decisions APITypeSafe JevSame idea; OpenAI's adds image inputs. Its price isn't announced.

10Handle with care

  • The Pro 200 figures (20× → 10×, the $2,500 credit, the 30 October date) are press-reported, not on OpenAI's page.
  • The claim that OpenAI cut the stream's audio to hide the dots demo hiccup is unverified.
  • “Sol beats Opus 5.5” holds only on some of OpenAI's charts and one creator's run; on Artificial Analysis it scores lower.
  • GPT-6.1 Astra's cancellation is reported by the WSJ, not announced by OpenAI.
  • Artificial Analysis's Sol numbers were only hours old on 29 September, and its Sonnet 5.5 scores came from a pre-release build with a bug; both may change.

11Sources

Benchmarked · the AI news, fact-checked · Facts as of 29 Sep 2026 · labels show who reported each number: vendor, independent, press, community